The Courts logic is that because the Congress cannot take citizenship away from a person because he is Negro. the Congress cannot take it away because he changed his allegiance and voted in the political election of another countryor even because he is a traitor. The Court raised the specious argument of "race. color. and creed"-apparently believing that it is justification for any decision these days. Yet race. color. and creed had nothing whatsoever to do with a naturalized PolishAmerican who voted in an Israel election. The Court said: Citizenship in this Nation Is part of a cooperative affair. So cooperative that we must permit citizens to roam the earth. vote where they please. but always come home when the foreign grass is no longer green and the foreign welcome peters out?
Keywords matched
naturalized