I think it is a false analogy to present that type of comparison in this debate. I take Senators now to two types of agricultural communities. One of them has become dependent upon migrant families to pick berries. cherries. pears. apples. or whatnot. because of the simple lack of local labor to do that work. I would prefer that local labor were available to do the work. as I have said to some of my friends in the labor movement who have for years disagreed with me because of my position with respect to agricultural labor. I have said that there is a middle road that ought to be followed. and it is that middle road that I favor in connection with the language of the bill. and it is the language that I proposed which was adopted. I say to. the labor leaders: "You cant supply that kind of labor. and you are not supplying it. on a local basis. In fact. such .labor Is not now being supplied. since the elimination without adequate cause. in my judgment. of the bracero program." But let me take Senators to an agricultural community which is dependent upon the work of 500 migrant families in the area. They sometimes bring into the community. more than a thousand children. I do not need to point out the disruptive effect that that has in many respects upon community life. Although the practice varies among the States. it is to the credit of the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Labor that great improvements have been made in the last 10 years in housing requirements and in the cooperation among the States. In many communities the migrant housing facilities are not at all good. but at least. in most instances. such facilities are required to be sanitary. and water and toilet facilities are now provided. Let us consider a family having from two to five youngsters. The Senator from New York says such a family may have five. six. or seven children.