Session #88 · 1963–65

Speech #880197577

However. the Departments own records show that Oswald clearly intended to give up his citizenship. Only the State Departments interpretation of the lawwhich is open to serious questioncleared the way for Oswald to return to the United States despite his renouncement of his citizenship in a sworn affidavit. Had there been a fullscale review of all the facets of immigration policy and the administration of the lawas the one we are today asking Congress to supportthe State Departments highly questionable procedures of handling "defectors" might have been brought to light in time to have caused Congress to force the Secretary of State to tighten up his regulations governing procedures on renouncing of U.S. citizenshipand thus barring Oswald from the "free passage" he received back to this country. Is this review of our immigration policy needed today? The answer is a clear and loud "Yes." Let me open your eyes to a few more facts. In a letter to a member of the other legislative body.
Keywords matched
immigration

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
95%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural Security threat

Speaker & context

Speaker
MICHAEL FEIGHAN
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
OH
Gender
M
Date
Speech ID
880197577
Paragraph
#7
← Prev Next →