I repeat the words "which we are recommending"in itself requires us to look forward 20 months into the future to forsee our needs in the face of a highly volatile employment situation. We think both the Congress and the administration should have the opportunity to reexamine the need for continuation of the program In the light of further and now unpredictable developments in the labor market situation. I think another point needs to be answered. namely. that. as the distinguished Senator from Florida has so ably. pointed out in his main presentation. it is completely impractical to apply to a man who is in this country as a single man. the same principles that are applied to migrant workers who travel not only with their wives. but. also many times with their children. and also with. the grandparents. and sometimes with grandparents on both sides of the family. If this proposal were made applicable.. the entire law would become meaningless and unworkable. Of course. I have no doubt that that is what the Senator from Minnesota had in mind when he offered this amendment. I also wish to point out that the amendment provides. at line 8 "including workmens compensation" andiother benefits. The Secretary of Labor is now requiring these benefits for migrant workers. under selfanointed power. under the laws of this country. by refusing to allow farmers the right to use the Employment Services unless the farmers assure the Secretary that the living conditions of the migrant workers are up to certain standards. So. Mr.