House Resolution 184. appeared to me to be necessary. in order to provide the means to expose the hypocrisy of the Soviet Union in their repeated attempts to brand the United States with the label of colonialism and imperialism. This in spite of the fact that for some time it has been apparent to the world that instead of the freedoms which the Communist regimes promise people of many nations who have been possibly dissatisfied with some aspect of their own existing governmental policiesthey haveafter successfully taking over the governmentsgiven them slavery. We have only to view the examples of the Berlin wall. the barbed wire fences. blockades. and border patrols established by Communist regimes all over the world. They have apparently found such means necessary in order to keep the supposedly free people within the borders of the areas they had succeeded in taking over and controlling. These examples clearly prove the fallacy of the supposed Communist freedom. Certainly it should not be necessary to erect walls or maintain border patrols around a country of satisfied citizens in order to keep them within the boundaries of that country. Our Nation is an outstanding example. on the other hand. of a government which instead has had to erect immigration barriers to keep people from all over the world from coming in hordes to this country. It recalls to my mind the descriptive words of the American Indian who said to the missionaries "your acts speak so loud that I cannot hear what you say." Our United States. now 50 in number. was historically settled for some very opposing reasons. The French wanted to find greater fishing territory. as well as to preach Christianity to the Indians.
Keywords matched
border patrol immigration