The belief that no safeguard for testing the value of human statements is comparable to that furnished by crossexamination and the conviction that no statement (unless by special exception) should be used as testimony until it has been probed and sublimated by that test. has found increasing strength in lengthening experience." Where administrative action has raised serious constitutional problems. the Court has assumed that Congress or the President intended to afford these affected by the action the traditional safeguards of due process. See. e.g.. The Japanese Immigrant case (189 U.S. 86. 101). Dismuke v. United States (297 US. 167. 172).
Keywords matched
Immigrant