Chairman. While this does deal with unused quotas. as did the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York yesterdayand I should like to read the Celler amendment: Section 201 (a). change period at the end of subsection to colon and add the following: "Provided further. That the unused portion of the sum total of all quotas for each fiscal year shall be made available in the following fiscal year in direct proportion to the quotas for each quota area affected. to immigrants specified in paragraph (4) of section 203 (a) of this title if such immigrants are determined to be chargeable to quotas not exceeding 7.000 annually." My amendment is entirely different. It does deal with the unused quotas in each fiscal year. but it sets up an entirely different method of allocating those unused quotas as distinguished from the Celler amendment. I think the purpose of my amendment. therefore. is distinguishable from the Celler amendment.
Keywords matched
immigrants