Session #82 · 1951–53

Speech #820191259

However. I do not favor the idea of an ambassador. simply because I do not think that the post warrants an ambassador. There are no matters of trade involved. no matters of customs. military cooperation. exchange of currency. immigration. or many other matters usually connected with ambassadorships. Therefore I do not think the position requires an ambassador. But I do think we should strike this particular section from the bill because. first. it seems to me to prohibit even a presidential envoy. which I favor as a means of presenting United States views to the Vatican. and. second. because the very presence of this legislative section has been and will be the source of unnecessary disunity at a time when unity in our country is vital to our defense.
Keywords matched
immigration

Classification

Target group
None Specific
Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
70%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
CHARLES BENNETT
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
FL
Gender
M
Date
—
Speech ID
820191259
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →