Session #71 · 1929–31

Speech #710000447

HocH. The other States. based on the 1920 census. would not be affected. Of course. what would happen upon the basis of the 1930 census is entirely problematical. (The table above referred to is as follows :) Table showing a reapportionment of 435 Representatives in Congress on the basis of the total population as compared with a reapportionment based on the population exclusive of the foreign born 1ho have not become naturalized. It is based on the census of 1920 and the method of " major fractions" was used Reapportionment on basis ofPresent Total State membership population. Total excluding population aliens (unnaturalized foreign born) Total ------------------------------ 435 435 435 Alabama -------------------------------- 10 10 10 Arizona --------------------------------- 1 1 1 Arkansas -------------------------------- 7 7 8 California ---------------------------- 11 14 13 Colorado -------------------------------- 4 4 4 Connecticut ----------------------------- 5 6 5 Delaware -------------------------------- 1 1 1 Florida --------------------------------- 4 4 4 Georgia --------------------------------- 12 12 13 Idaho ----------------------------------- 2 2 2 Illinois ---------------------------------- 27 27 27 Indiana --------------------------------- 13 12 13 Iowa ------------------------------------ 11 10 10 Kansas ---------------------------------- 8 7 8 Kentucky ------------------------------- 11 10 11 Louisiana ------------------------------- 8 7 8 M aine ----------------------------------- 4 3 3 Maryland ------------------------------- 6 6 6 Massachusetts --------------------------- 16 16 14 Michigan -----------------------------.. 13 15 15 Minnesota ------------------------------- 10 10 10 Mississippi ------------------------------ 8 7 8 Missouri -------------------------------- 16 14 15 Montana -------------------------------- 2 2 2 Nebraska -------------------------------- 6 5 6 Nevada --------------------------------- 1 1 1 New Hampshire ------------------------ 2 2 2 New Jersey ------------------------------ 12 13 12 New Mexico .---------------------------- 1 1 1 New York ----------------------------- 43 43 39 North Carolina ------------------------- 10 11 11 North Dakota --------------_---------- - 3 3 3 Ohio ------------------------------------ 22 24 24 Oklahoma ------------------------------- 8 8 9 Oregon ---------------------------------- 3 3 3 Pennsylvania ---------------------------- 36 36 35 Rhode Island ------------- ------------3 2 2 South Carolina -------------------------- 7 7 7 South Dakota --------------------------- 3 3 3 Tennessee ------------------------------- 10 30 10 Texas ----------------------------------- 18 19 19 Utah ------------------------------------ 2 2 2 Vermont -------------------------------- 2 1 1 Virginia -------------------------------- 10 10 10 Washington ----------------------------- 5 6 f West Virginia --------------------------- 6 6 6 Wisconsin ------------------------------- 11 11 11 Wyoming -------------------------------- 1 1 1
Keywords matched
foreign born naturalized

Classification

Sentiment
Neutral
Stereotyping
No
Confidence
90%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
FREDERICK DOMINICK
Party
D
Chamber
H
State
SC
Gender
M
Date
Speech ID
710000447
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →