The other gentlemuen did not answver. 3. The reply does not indicate any purpose on the part of Commissioner General Hull. his superiors. or assistants. to disregard any such1 agreement. 4. Commissioner General Hull says: " The Immigration Service is not a party to the plan." If that statement is true. any such agreement was made by outsiders and amounls to nothing. and Mr. Ilnls long explanation and defense of It are useless. Other parts of the letter show that the Immigration - Service was a party to tile plan. The commissioner general tries to show tie existence of a bad situation. creating a necessity for the arI rangement. Part of his language Is: " It was ill the face of this situa. * I tion that the chief supervisor was seat to Calexico."
Keywords matched
Immigration