Now. what becomes of that position? If that portion of the statement is not a part of the treaty and is not ratified. what becomes of our domestic questions? As tIhe Senator from Utah has well said. it leaves Japan free to claim that domiestic questions come within the purview of the treaty. and she can still agitate tile question of immigration in California and stillhave.a cause for trouble with us and a cause for negotiation with us. But how about the Japanese mandated islands? Oh. they are provided for in the supplemental treaty which is before the Senate today.
Keywords matched
immigration