Session #65 · 1917–19

Speech #650385488

President. it will be seen from the foregoing tlat we already have here a very large number of foreignborn women. Of course. many of these are illiteratei many have had no educational advantages. Another fact that should not be overlooked is this: The tendency to enter into marital relations is marked among these immigrant races. Of course. we know little or nothing about their loyalty and the real allegiance of these women and less about their character. many of them may be anarchists. nihilists. polygamists. yet these Women amy. simply through the performance of a marriage ceremony. become citizens of the United. States. "Is it not essential that we should write in. the Constitution a provision which will enable Congress to pass legislation that will restrict the menace arising from this condition? I do not think the amendment as drawn does this. and I believe that Congress should take the precaution to lay the foundation for protecting the country in this regard. After consultation with the legal advisers of the Immigration and Naturalization Bureaus I am firmly of the opinion that if the amendment should be adopted as drawn it will not be possible thereafter for Congress to remedy the situation described by me by passing legislation. In other words. the constitutional amendment. unless it shall be changed in some such manner as that I suggest. will prevent the passing of any legislation to place any restriction with regard to the exercise of the franchise upon foreign. women. who have become citizens by marriage. "This citizenshipbymarriage provision was enacted by the Federal Congress when women could not vote and at a tinle when Congress had no thought of giving them the vote. its object being to protect property and dower rights and to care for many legal and international questions. To accomplish these purposes Congress conferred the benefit of such citizenship upon such women. Now women are asking for the additional benefit of the right of suffragetoo long denied thembut a changed situation is created. which Cngress should carefully consider before passing a constitutional amendment. The view has been expressed by some lawyers that Congress could afford protection to the elective franchise under this constitutional amendment by hereafter passing statutes naturalizing foreign women married to citizens and wbrtly of the privilege of voting. Possibly a statute could be passed that hereafter would protect the electorate and compel married. women who fave become citizens by marriage to be naturalized in a court proceeding b6forethey vote. but I do. not believe it. "To hold that it can is tantamount to holding that the Congress can by statute -compel a woman who has already been. naturalized by marriage and who has by that process of naturalization become as full a citizen as though born here. to go through another process of naturalizationthe court processbefore she will be allowed to vote. notwithstanding a provision in the Constitution prohibiting the United States or the several States from! denying or abridging on account of sex the right of a citizen to vote. No law will or can be passed hereafter in that regard tlat will protect. the electorate against the unworthy or unqualified women who are given this right under this constitutional amendment unless you lay the foundation in the amendment itself by the use of words that will confer up6n Congress the power to do so. "IPerhaps it might be thought that the second section of the article of the amendment proposed in the resolution. providing that the Congress shall have power by appropriate legislation to enforce the provisions of thte article. would lay a sufficient foundation for subsequent legislation dealing with the subject I am discussing. But I think that. obviously. such is not the case.
Identified stereotypes
Generalizes that many foreign-born women are illiterate, lack educational advantages, and may be anarchists, nihilists, or polygamists.
Keywords matched
immigrant Immigration naturalized Naturalization naturalizing naturalization naturalizationthe

Classification

Target group
Sentiment
Negative
Stereotyping
⚠️ Yes
Confidence
100%
Model
gemini-2.0-flash
Framing
Cultural threat Security threat Legal / procedural

Speaker & context

Speaker
Unknown
Party
Chamber
State
Gender
Date
Speech ID
650385488
Paragraph
#0
← Prev Next →