Mr. Chairman. there are two reasons why I think It is objectionable and subject to a point of order. In the first place it goes outside of the scope of the bill. %x"hich relates simply to naturalization and deportation. Another 19t8. thing. it invades the principle of State rights. The State alone can control the question of ownership of land. as many c the States have done. It seems to me that it is out of orde in any bill. and is not germane or legitimate for Congress t enact such legislation. Certainly in that view of it it woul be out of order.
Keywords matched
naturalization deportation