subsequently said: I want to call the attention of the committee to the amendment which was adopted on page 48. which reads: Provided. That. if the person sending for wife or minor children is nattlraized. a wife to whom married or a minor child born subsequent to such husband or fathers naturalization shall be admitted without detention for treatment in hospital. and with respect to a wife to whom married or a minor child born prior to such husband or fathers naturalization the provisions of this section shall be observed even though such person is unable to pay the expense bf treatmentAs to the amendment thus far I raise no objection. but It continuessuch expense to be paid from the appropriation for the enforcement of this act. It would seem to me that that language would compel the United States Government to defray such expenses even though the husband were abundantly able to do so. I want to ask the chairman of the committee if that Is not the construction that is likely to be given to that language?
Keywords matched
naturalization