At least that is what we understand to be the attitude of the courts with regard to the matter of naturalization. That is what the committee meant when it wrote that language into the bill. The gentleman fron California [Mr. "IAYES] now proposes to declare definitely what the bill proposes in questionable language. Is there any condition in the country which ought to prevent or persuade us from saying clearly what is a fair interpretation of the language of the bill? That is the question before the House. Are our foreign relations so acute and so liable to bring us into trouble with our foreign neighbors that we can not write into the bill in unmistakable language the courts interpretation of the laguage of the bill as it stands?
Keywords matched
naturalization