Cliairmain. becaulse the appropriation in this laragraph is less than was recommended by the department or because it is under the estimate is no reasoii why it should be in order. Why. the paragmpih is much more palpably subject to 1le point of order tht the point of order made against thy statement that. the leaders were making no effoctul effort to force the innediate consider.liou of tile inmiigration bill. Early in December is now pa:st alid gone. [ile statement that I imde that there is now before the hlouse :il immigratiou bill and tfhat the Democratic lcaiders are sitiitilg to its leing stifled is much more in order 1:1ni:11 the para gilpli in this bill seeking to aplropriate money that is not needeid oni the face of the bill for more than six nlontlis. Where ire lie Democratic leaders that they are not here fightjiug the filibuster against this bill if they vant to get to the iiimittionbill? IAppleuse oii the Republican side.]
Keywords matched
immigratiou