That is not necessary. If the treaty in its nature is a further modification of something that has already been treated about. it is supplemental. It is true the treaty of 1894 does not say anything about what it is supplemental to. but in view of the fact that in 1880 we agreed that we might limit. regulate. or suspend. and then in 1894. treating on the same subject. that we might have a right for ten years thereafter to absolutely prohibit. it is my conclusion. and I have no difficulty in reaching it. that the treaty of 1894 takes the place on this subject of immigration of the treaty of 1880. and it stands there as the law. the supreme law. of the land. that even a Treasury official has no right to violate. It stands there. Mr.
Keywords matched
immigration