amendment strikes out the words obliging the student to go home when his student days are over and the purpose for which he came hither has been accomplished. There is no good reason for a change like that. The language of the section is the language of the present law. and that law has worked well in the case of students and should be preserved. That it is the language of the present law the reader will see by turning to page 159 of the printed report of the Chineseexclusion hearings of the Senate Committee on Immigration. Who is asking that the present law be weakened?
Keywords matched
Immigration