John Sedgwick. and Hooper C. Van Vorst. It is to be presumed that. in each case of naturalization during that time. a certificate was given like in form to that received by Coleman. and averring that the court had ordered the admission of the party. That series of judges must have regarded what was found on the files. or in the records or books of the court in each case as an order of admission. or as a record of showing that such an order had been made by the court. The stipulation of facts states that in the casti of each person whose name is entered in the book as naturalized there are on Iile papers resembling in all respects those In the case of Coleman. And finally. after an able discussion of the law and the facts involved in -he case. he says: Ii therefore appears that Coleman was duly and legally admitted to citizen. shi . andthat the legality of his admission was not invalidated by any act or omission which occurred either prior or subsequently to his admission. As he wa legally admitted it was proper for the court to give him the certificate of citizenship which was given to him. and that certificate was not unlawfully issued or made.
Keywords matched
naturalized naturalization