And yet we are gravely told in this debate that these are mere "sentiments." opinions founded merely on passion or feeling. Our entire history and the character and conduct of our people contradict such an assumption. The doctrine of "expatriation" or the right of migration is coeval with our nati onal existence. an:t for which we never ceased to contend until it was conceded by all nations. and on the 27th day of July. 1868. we placed the following declaration onl our statutebook. namely: Whereas the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people. indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life. liberty. and the pursuit of happiness . and Whereas in the recognition of this principle this Government has freely received emigrants from all nations. and invested them with the rights of citizenship. It is rather a remarkable coincidence that on the very day following the passage of the foregoing l aw. namely. July 28. 1868. we formed our (Burlinganm) treaty with China. and which contains this clause: The United States of America and the Emperor of China cordially recognize the inherent and inalienable right of man to change his home and allegiance. and also the mutual advantage of the free migration and emigration of their citizens and subjects respectively from the one country to the other for purposes of curiosity. of trade. or as permanent residents. I ask again. is all this merely a "sentiment ?" Our people have at least shown a most laudable persistency in adhering to it until it has become a part of our laws and our treaties. and is the practical result of the invitation we have given and the promise we have made to all peoples: to come to our shores. without regard to race or religion. and enjoy with us the benefits of free government. Now it is proposed to strike down this principle. to restrict. to suspendyes. virtually to destroy this right of migration.
Keywords matched
emigrants emigration