Now. of those which the minority claim should be further deducted I have deducted the vote of Clark. who put in a marked ballot. stating as the reason that "old Jim might know that he had not voted against his wishes." I do not conceive there could be any doubt that here was a case of a distinguishing mark put upon a ballot to give intelligence ms to the character of a vote. and that this was contrary to the law of California. I also exclude OMara. who per6onated another man. he being sixty years of age and personating a man of thirtyfour. The fact of such personation is undisputed. I exclude the vote of Ferret. who was an unnaturalized citizen. who had not a legal certificate of naturalization. I exclude Petersou. who obtained a fraudulent certificate byawearing falsely and by introducing a witness who swore falsely. I read from the evidence on this point: Quoation.
Keywords matched
naturalization