This bringsus down tothe two remaining votes which it is claimed on the part of the sitting member were illegal and were cast for the contestant. One is the vote of Peterson. He voted upon fraudulent naturalization papers. The gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Spalxoaoac when he presented his report to the House agreed with the minority of the committee that the naturalization papers of Peterson were fraudulently procured. and that his vote should be deducted from the aggregate vote returned for the contestant. He has changed his position upon that question. I call attention to the evidence: Question. When you applied for naturalization at Redwod City the day before the last presidential election. had you first papersI mean your declaration of intention Y Answer. No. I did not have them.
Keywords matched
naturalization