If we do not mem that. let its say no1thitig or say we do not. but do not incorporate into the law at thing that nobody knows what it does. Titis looks to it like a political platform. au reminhds me of whc:t I heartd otiec on a diicolt questioi in kiownoliig times. It then souted to be admitted all around that there was some difficulty about tile naturalization laws. .iid there was great trouble in getting at the thing as ho just what should be done. The suggestion was made by nietubers of one party that they put in their platfori that they were in fevor of a judicious revision of the naturalization laws. It was accordingly unanimoaisly adopteda judicious revision. Then tIe speakers welt out on the stump. and to those whs wanted the uaturalizatio laws to be so fixed that a foreigner should not vote until lie was twenty! one years here they said that was a judicious revision. Some thought that a naturalized foreigner shonhl not vote at all. and they said that as a judicious revision. Anotherthonght Itt the naturalizatio laws should le repealed so that a mati could vote without being naturalized. and he thought that would be a judicious revisiot. They carried the State on that platform. but never carried it again after that. This thing may run through a campaign in the same way.
Keywords matched
naturalized naturalization